Moving into a dominant discourse may, as Gee suggests, means giving up primary discourse values but it ultimately depends on the circumstances.  Gee states,”…true acquisition of many mainstream Discourses involves, at least while being in them, active complicity with value that conflict with one’s home and community-based Discourses…”.  This means that when you are trying to transfer into a new discourse one needs to let go of your primary discourse values because they can create a conflict between your old and new discourse.  This is true depending on what discourse you were a part of and the discourse you want to be a part of.  On the other hand Delpit states,”Acquiring the ability to function in a dominant discourse does not mean that one must reject one’s home identity and values.”  Delpit states this to show that you do not need to let go of your past discourse to become part of a new, future, discourse.  Gee and Delpit both have opposite stances on whether or not one should or should not let go of values from a past discourse in order to not clash with your new discourse.  I believe that they both are right in their stances because ultimately it depends on the discourse you come from and the discourse you are switching to.